Dear ³Ô¹ÏÍ·Ìõ Community,<\/p>\n
I am writing to follow up on this week\u2019s University Senate discussion. After careful consideration, I am rescinding my prior disapproval of the proposed amendment and returning the matter to the Senate for action consistent with its established process. I also want to clarify the context surrounding my earlier action and outline steps we can take together to strengthen clarity in our governance moving forward.<\/p>\n
In advance of taking formal action, I consulted with Senate leadership, shared my hesitation, and expressed a preference that the matter be addressed through Senate action rather than presidential action. Based on our discussion and shared interpretation of the governing documents, it was understood that this step would be necessary to move the matter forward. While this was not my preferred approach, it was taken in an effort to follow what was believed to be the appropriate process at the time. It is also important to note that, while our documents and practices have not always been applied consistently, the practice of receiving presidential feedback, and where appropriate approval on Senate actions, including constitutional amendments, has established precedent at WestConn.<\/p>\n
I also want to address directly the broader concerns raised. Suggestions that I am not supportive of shared governance, collaboration, or dialogue do not reflect how I have approached this role. Since my arrival, my focus has been on building relationships, engaging openly, and working in partnership across our community. I understand that past experiences may shape how actions are interpreted, and I respect that history. At the same time, I ask that my actions be considered based on how I have engaged and the commitments I have made.<\/p>\n
As I shared in the meeting, how we engage one another in moments like this matters as much as the outcome. These are complex issues, and we should approach them with curiosity, generosity of intent, and a willingness to listen to understand. We can disagree, at times strongly, without becoming adversarial. The assumptions we make about one another shape the culture we are building together, and we are at our best when we model the thoughtful, respectful dialogue we ask of our students.<\/p>\n
Our governing documents, including the Constitution, bylaws, and related materials, are not always as clear or aligned as they should be, which can place all of us in a difficult position. The discussion at Senate, and in the days since, has made clear that our current language and processes are creating confusion, particularly in times of transition.<\/p>\n
To move forward constructively, pursuant to the Senate Constitution (IV.A.1.), I have requested that the Senate President form a Senate Review Committee to develop and submit a report on proposed constitutional amendments that clarify roles, responsibilities, and processes, and reduce ambiguity in our governance framework. This is not about disagreement in values, but about ensuring that our framework is clear, consistent, and supports the shared governance we all seek to uphold.<\/p>\n
My preference is to lead through dialogue and relationships. That is how we build trust and create something that lasts. I believe we have an opportunity to do that here, together.<\/p>\n
Thank you for your engagement and your continued commitment to the university.<\/p>\n
Sincerely,
\nJesse M. Bernal, Ph.D.
\nPresident<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Dear ³Ô¹ÏÍ·Ìõ Community, I am writing to follow up on this week\u2019s University Senate discussion. After careful consideration, I am rescinding my prior disapproval of the proposed amendment and returning the matter to the Senate for action …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":429,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_wds_title":"","_wds_metadesc":"","_wds_focus-keywords":"","_wds_meta-robots-adv":"","_wds_meta-robots-noindex":false,"_wds_meta-robots-nofollow":false,"_wds_meta-robots-index":false,"_wds_meta-robots-follow":false,"_wds_autolinks-exclude":false,"_wds_canonical":"","_wds_opengraph":[],"_wds_twitter":[],"wds_primary_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/429"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4180\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wcsu.edu\/president\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}